The Telangana Excessive Court docket directed the State authorities to look at the problem of regularisation of non permanent and contract staff, observing that hundreds of comparable circumstances had been pending and that clear coverage pointers may assist resolve disputes and cut back the burden on courts
Revealed Date – 13 March 2026, 12:12 AM
Hyderabad: Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice GM Mohiuddin of the Telangana Excessive Court docket on Thursday directed the State authorities to look at the problem of regularisation of non permanent and contract staff whereas listening to a writ attraction filed by Jawaharlal Nehru Technological College (JNTU).
The attraction was filed difficult the order of a single decide in a petition filed by A Narasimha, who had questioned a dismissal memo issued by the College.
In his petition, Narasimha sought cancellation of the unilateral memo and requested that he be granted all service advantages from the date of completion of 5 years of service by way of GO Ms No. 212 dated April 22, 1994. The only decide, after listening to the matter, had put aside the dismissal memo issued by JNTU and famous that the petitioner had been working as a File Assistant for almost 20 years. The Court docket directed the College to regularise his providers inside 4 weeks from the date of receipt of the order and to increase consequential advantages together with seniority, wage, arrears and promotion from the date of completion of 5 years of service. Aggrieved by the order, JNTU filed the current attraction earlier than the Division Bench.
Through the listening to, the Chief Justice noticed that hundreds of comparable circumstances regarding non permanent and contract staff are pending earlier than the courts. The Bench opined that the problem requires a coverage determination by the federal government. The Court docket referred to the ideas laid down by the Supreme Court docket within the Umadevi judgment, which held that staff who’ve been working for lengthy durations in non permanent or contractual positions could also be thought-about for regularisation topic to sure situations.
The Chief Justice additionally famous that related instructions are being carried out in different States, together with Jharkhand. The Bench noticed that if acceptable pointers are framed in accordance with the ideas laid down by the Supreme Court docket, numerous pending circumstances could possibly be resolved and the burden on the courts can be considerably decreased.
The Court docket additionally famous that no complete Authorities Order or laws addressing this situation has been framed within the State since 1993. Accordingly, the Bench requested the Advocate Basic to carry the problem to the discover of the involved authorities within the authorities and take steps for formulation of pointers relating to regularisation of non permanent and contract staff.
The matter was adjourned to April 15 for additional listening to. Within the meantime, the Division Bench stayed the operation of the order handed by the one decide.
Â
Â
